case law explanation Things To Know Before You Buy
case law explanation Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all be certain law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed underneath have had opinions filed for them within the final 14 days. The following information is obtainable for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which includes signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then search for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court while in the United States. Reduce courts on the federal level include the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of check here International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related to your United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its have judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is commonly referred to given that the “supreme” court, Whilst there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Whilst state courts can also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
The legislation as set up in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to try and do away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.
Problems or Errors For those who encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a undesirable link or possibly a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Centre.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners could request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more